The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6403•Michael Anthony Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
24-6403Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6403
MICHAEL ANTHONY DOBSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. THOMPSON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HAROLD CLARKE; STEVEN HERRICK; BERNARD W. BOOKER; RICKY
WHITE; DOCTOR QUINN; ANN-MARIE CATHERINE WHITE; CHARISSE
MONAE MULLEN; NURSE A. J. WILLIAMSON; SERGEANT BROWN;
MAILROOM MANAGER; MAJOR KING; MR. COLLINS; OFFICER COX; K-
9 OFFICER; LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00132-JAG-MRC)
Submitted: June 16, 2025 Decided: August 4, 2025
Before THACKER and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Michael Dobson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, SANDS ANDERSON,
PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Dobson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for
discovery, granting summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing Dobson’s action filed
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have reviewed the record and Dobson’s claims and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dobson’s motion objecting to the terms of the
Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, entitled “Motion for Relief from undue hardship,” and
affirm the district court’s orders. Dobson v. Thompson, No. 3:22-cv-00132-JAG-MRC
(E.D. Va. Nov. 28, 2023; Dec. 13, 2023; Apr. 4, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.