The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6424•United States of America v. Kaishein Tairelle Cooper
24-6424Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 30, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6424
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAISHEIN TAIRELLE COOPER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:22-cr-00086-EWH-DEM-2)
Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024
Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kaishein Tairelle Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kaishein Tairelle Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motions for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 821 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. Having reviewed the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district
court’s determination that the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against a
sentence reduction. See United States v. Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019)
(explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Cooper, No. 2:22-cr-00086-EWH-DEM-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.