The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6481•United States of America v. Troyvon Devontae Carroll
24-6481Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6481
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TROYVON DEVONTAE CARROLL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00493-D-1)
Submitted: May 29, 2025 Decided: June 3, 2025
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troyvon Devontae Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Troyvon Devontae Carroll appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motions for reduction of sentence. After reviewing the record, we conclude
that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Carroll’s motions. See United
States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Carroll, No.
5:19-cr-00493-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.