The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6497•United States of America v. Jimmy Lawrence Nance
24-6497Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6497
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-1)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 3, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and Nance’s arguments in his
informal brief, as amended, and we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying Nance’s motion. See United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th
Cir. 2023) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Nance, No. 7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2025). We deny Nance’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.