The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6512•United States of America v. Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed
24-6512Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6512
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TAWFEEQ HAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cr-00385-RDA-1)
Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Michael Schlessinger,
Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed appeals the district court’s order denying
his second motion to terminate his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).
We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. See United States v.
Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of § 3583(e)(1) motion for
abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We also deny
Mohammed’s motions for the appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government
expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.