The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6556•James R. Rose v. BRYAN STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections
24-6556Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6556
JAMES R. ROSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Robert Bryan Harwell, Senior District Judge. (0:23-cv-05261-RBH)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Rose, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Rose appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Rose’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rose v. Stirling, No. 0:23-cv-
05261-RBH (D.S.C. May 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.