The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6564•Jamie Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
24-6564Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 9, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6564
JAMIE GOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LAVERN COHEN;
UNITED STATES; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION,
PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:24-cv-00791-MGL)
Submitted: October 31, 2024 Decided: November 8, 2024
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie Goss, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Goss appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Goss v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr.,
No. 4:24-cv-00791-MGL (D.S.C. May 21, 2024). We also deny Goss’s motion objecting
to this court’s order granting him leave to appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.