The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6570•United States of America v. Donte Bernard Baker, a/k/a Tay, a/k/a Donnie
24-6570Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6570
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONTE BERNARD BAKER, a/k/a Tay, a/k/a Donnie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00426-JKB-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donte Bernard Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Scott Tsuei, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donte Bernard Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and for a sentence reduction
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Baker, No. 1:11-
cr-00426-JKB-1 (D. Md. May 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.