The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6573•Rashaud Hussein Azar El, a/k/a Jerimy Love, a/k/a Jeremy R. Love v. Cabarrus County
24-6573Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 11, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6573
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL, a/k/a Jerimy Love, a/k/a Jeremy R. Love,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CABARRUS COUNTY; CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL; MIKE DOWNS, Cabarrus
County Manager; ANGEL GONZALEZ, Concord Police Department; BROCK
VANSCOTER, Cabarrus County Magistrate; DECKSTER BARLOWE, Cabarrus
County Magistrate; SHERIFF VAN SHAW, Cabarrus County Sheriff; SET A.
ROBERTS, Cabarrus County Deputy; SYDNEY CARTER, District Attorney;
CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF;
CABARRUS COUNTY COURT,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:24-cv-00362-CCE-JLW)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 10, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rashaud Hussein Azar El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El appeals the district court’s order dismissing Azar El’s
civil complaint without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Azar El’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Azar
El v. Cabarrus Cnty., No. 1:24-cv-00362-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2024). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.