Oscar Perez v. Ronnie Lane Huneycutt

24-6645Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 7, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6645
OSCAR PEREZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT; ERIC DYE, Deputy Warden; JEFFREY
DUNCAN, Deputy Warden; DARREN DAVES, Green Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:22-cv-00076-MR)
Submitted: June 30, 2025 Decided: August 7, 2025
Before RICHARDSON and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Perez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Perez appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Appellees on his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and striking his proposed surreply.
Preliminarily, we grant Perez’s motion for leave to file a supplemental informal brief, but
we deny his motion for assignment of counsel. We have reviewed the record in the light
most favorable to Perez and find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary
judgment. See Dean v. Jones, 984 F.3d 295, 301 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of
review). Nor do we discern any abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to strike
Perez’s unauthorized surreply. See FDIC v. Cashion, 720 F.3d 169, 176 (4th Cir. 2013)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Perez v.
Huneycutt, No. 5:22-cv-00076-MR (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.