The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6695•Randy Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
24-6695Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 15, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6695
RANDY ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL STAFF AT RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00348-RCY-MRC)
Submitted: October 31, 2024 Decided: January 14, 2025
Before QUATTLEBAUM and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randy Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to
complete and submit a consent to collection of fees form.* We have reviewed the record
and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Anderson v. Corr. Staff at Rappahannock Reg’l Jail, No. 3:24-cv-00348-RCY-MRC (E.D.
Va. July 1, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The dismissal order is final and appealable because the district court did not grant
leave to amend. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.