The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6708•United States of America v. Marc Pierre Hall, a/k/a Marc Valeriano, a/k/a Fella
24-6708Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6708
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARC PIERRE HALL, a/k/a Marc Valeriano, a/k/a Fella,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-1)
Submitted: November 14, 2024 Decided: November 19, 2024
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marc Pierre Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marc Pierre Hall appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part A of Amendment 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. On appeal, Hall does not challenge the district court’s calculation
of his amended Guidelines range after application of the amendment, the extent of the
sentence reduction, or the adequacy of the district court’s explanation. And we find no
merit to Hall’s challenge to the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Hall, No. 3:95-cr-0005-FDW-1
(W.D.N.C. July 2, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.