The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6722•United States of America v. Roderick Warner Wheless
24-6722Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 9, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6722
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK WARNER WHELESS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cr-00230-WO-1)
Submitted: August 29, 2025 Decided: October 9, 2025
Before KING, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Warner Wheless, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Warner Wheless appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
a sentence reduction or compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See United States v. Wheless, No. 1:07-cr-00230-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. July 11, 2024);
see also United States v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 659 (4th Cir. 2024) (“Even if a district court
abuses its discretion in assessing whether the defendant presents extraordinary and
compelling reasons for release, this Court may still affirm if the district court’s
consideration of the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors was sound.”). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.