The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6744•Michael Frasier v. SERGEANT DANIEL PRITCHARD, North Charleston Police Department
24-6744Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6744
MICHAEL FRASIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT DANIEL PRITCHARD, North Charleston Police Department;
STEVEN HALL, North Charleston Police Department; NORTH CHARLESTON
POLICE DEPARTMENT, S.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:23-cv-04163-DCC)
Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 27, 2024
Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Frasier, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, LLC,
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Frasier appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Frasier’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 civil complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Frasier v.
Pritchard, No. 2:23-cv-04163-DCC (D.S.C. July 16, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.