The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6798•United States of America v. Samuel Eddie Pheasant
24-6798Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6798
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL EDDIE PHEASANT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cr-00025-MR-1)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 28, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Eddie Pheasant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Eddie Pheasant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1). We have reviewed the record
and Pheasant’s arguments, and we find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Brown,
78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Pheasant, No. 2:06-cr-00025-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2024). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.