The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6814•Donald Parker v. Deputy T. Atkins
24-6814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6814
DONALD PARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY T. ATKINS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL; PORTSMOUTH SHERIFF DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:23-cv-00043-HEH-MRC)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without
prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to effect service. We have reviewed the
record and discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision. See Attkisson v.
Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 627 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing standard of review). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Parker v. Atkins, No. 3:23-cv-00043-HEH-MRC
(E.D. Va. July 26, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.