The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6896•United States of America v. Savino Braxton
24-6896Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6896
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAVINO BRAXTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cr-00478-JKB-1)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice his
motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) for early termination of supervised release. Upon
review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision. See United States
v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (providing standard of review). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Braxton, No. 1:09-cr-00478-JKB-1
(D. Md. Aug. 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.