The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6952•Donald Reynolds v. Warden, Fci Beckley
24-6952Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6952
DONALD REYNOLDS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, FCI BECKLEY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, Chief District Judge. (5:23-cv-00533)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Reynolds, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on Reynolds’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition
seeking to challenge the conditions of his confinement, and denying as moot Reynolds’
motions to take judicial notice, for leave to file evidence of systemic discrimination, for
leave to present additional evidence, and for discovery. We have reviewed the record in
conjunction with the issues Reynolds raises on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Reynolds v. Warden, FCI Beckley,
No. 5:23-cv-00533 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 16, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.