The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7020•Altony Brooks v. Kevin Oborghi; Leroy Ravenell
24-7020Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 26, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7020
ALTONY BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEVIN O BORGHI; LEROY RAVENELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:21-cv-03282-BHH)
Submitted: February 18, 2025 Decided: March 26, 2025
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, NESS & JETT, LLC,
Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Brooks v. Borghi, No. 5:21-cv-03282-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2024). We deny the motion
to dismiss as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.