The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7048•Ramone Wright v. Warden Fci Bennettsville
24-7048Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7048
RAMONE WRIGHT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (5:23-cv-00330-DCC)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramone Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ramone Wright appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and granting summary judgment to Respondent on Wright’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Wright v. Warden FCI Bennettsville, No. 5:23-cv-
00330-DCC (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.