The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7052•United States of America v. Charles Eloys Johnson, a/k/a Adam White
24-7052Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 29, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7052
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 29, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Eloys Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Eloys Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Johnson filed a motion in
this court to update his informal brief; we grant this motion. We have reviewed the record
and Johnson’s arguments in his amended informal brief, and we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson’s motion. See United States v. Brown,
78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2024).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.