The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7091•Genuine Truth Banner v. OFFICER BRANDEN DAVIS, Individual
24-7091Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7091
GENUINE TRUTH BANNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER BRANDEN DAVIS, Individual and Official Capacity; OFFICER
TENIESHA TUCKER, Individual and Official Capacity; LIEUTENANT
WILLIAM BURLEY, Individual and Official Capacity; ASSOCIATE WARDEN E.
RUDY TISDALE, Individual and Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:22-cv-04583-JD)
Submitted: April 24, 2025 Decided: April 29, 2025
Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Genuine Truth Banner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Genuine Truth Banner appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to dismiss, without prejudice, Banner’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Banner v. Davis, No. 6:22-cv-04583-JD (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2024). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.