The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7117•Zikomo Z. Hendrix, a/k/a Hendrix Z. Zikomo v. State Officials; Judge Alex Kinlaw; Brittany Scott; Judge Miller; Judge Waelde
24-7117Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7117
ZIKOMO Z. HENDRIX, a/k/a Hendrix Z. Zikomo,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OFFICIALS; JUDGE ALEX KINLAW; BRITTANY SCOTT; JUDGE
MILLER; JUDGE WAELDE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:24-cv-04185-DCC)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zikomo Z. Hendrix, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zikomo Z. Hendrix appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hendrix’s civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Hendrix v. State Officials, No. 6:24-cv-04185-DCC
(D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.