The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7158•Shelby Dean Skaggs v. JAY M. HOKE; VICTOR NAVY; T. M. DIVITA; JACKIE STEVENS, WVa. Bar No. 7234
24-7158Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7158
SHELBY DEAN SKAGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAY M. HOKE; VICTOR NAVY; T. M. DIVITA; JACKIE STEVENS, WVa. Bar
No. 7234,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:23-cv-00759)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shelby Dean Skaggs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shelby Dean Skaggs appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Skaggs’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Skaggs v. Hoke, No.
2:23-cv-00759 (S.D. W. Va. Nov. 25, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.