The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7188•Willie Orlando McKinnon v. Kimberly Brooke Cissel; Rachel Diane Morris
24-7188Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7188
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KIMBERLY BROOKE CISSEL; RACHEL DIANE MORRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02809-BAH)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Orlando McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Orlando McKinnon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii), 1915A(b)(2). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. McKinnon v. Cissel, No. 1:24-cv-02809-BAH (D. Md. Nov. 25, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.