The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-7196•United States of America v. Lovell Tyshon Ritchie, a/k/a Snaxx, a/k/a Snax
24-7196Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7196
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LOVELL TYSHON RITCHIE, a/k/a Snaxx, a/k/a Snax,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:13-cr-00072-JAG-7)
Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: April 1, 2025
Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lovell Tyshon Ritchie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lovell Tyshon Ritchie appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under
18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) for early termination of his supervised release. Upon review, we
discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision. See United States v. Pregent,
190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (providing standard of review). Accordingly, we deny
Ritchie’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s order. United States v.
Ritchie, No. 3:13-cr-00072-JAG-7 (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.