The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1026•Thurmond R. Guess, Sr. v. Daniel Coble, as Richland County Circuit Court
25-1026Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1026
THURMOND R. GUESS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL COBLE, as Richland County Circuit Court; MORGAN STUART STOUT;
TRAVELERS, Insurance Company Property, Casualty insurance company; BRETT
BAYNE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00068-MGL)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurmond R. Guess, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Edwin Akers, HOWELL, GIBSON
& HUGHES, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina; Margaret Urbanic, CLAWSON & STAUBES,
LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thurmond R. Guess, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Guess’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, and a subsequent order denying Guess’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion for reconsideration.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Guess v. Coble, No. 3:24-cv-00068-
MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2024; Dec. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the court
dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790,
791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.