Huguette Assaf, individually and on behalf of all other occupants v. Arlington County Sheriff’s Office

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1152
HUGUETTE ASSAF, individually and on behalf of all other occupants,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CLERK OF ARLINGTON
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; HONORABLE DANIEL TOMAS CROWE LOPEZ;
HONORABLE JUDITH L. WHEAT; HONORABLE JASON S. RUCKER; J. LY
PHAN; JIMMIE BARRETT; STANDBY DEPUTIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02264-LMB-LRV)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Huguette Assaf, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Huguette Assaf seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some of the
claims in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Assaf seeks to appeal did not resolve
all of her claims as to all parties and is therefore neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 193 (4th Cir. 2022)
(noting an order is not final “until it has resolved all claims as to all parties” (citation
modified)). Accordingly, we deny Assaf’s motion to assign counsel and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --