The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1218•William Strasburg v. H. A. BULL, Fairfax County Police Officer
25-1218Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1218
WILLIAM STRASBURG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
H. A. BULL, Fairfax County Police Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01174-MSN-IDD)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Strasburg, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, Assistant County Attorney,
FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Strasburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint and denying his motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Strasburg v. Bull,
No. 1:24-cv-01174-MSN-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.