The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1255•ANWAR A. AALAAM, Vessel; c/o Anwar A. Aalaam - Living Man v. MOVEMENT MORTGAGE, LLC, As Lender, and/or its successors, individually
25-1255Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 21, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1255
ANWAR A. AALAAM, Vessel; c/o Anwar A. Aalaam - Living Man,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MOVEMENT MORTGAGE, LLC, As Lender, and/or its successors, individually,
and in their official capacity, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud; U. S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, trustee for GNMA REMIC TRUST 2021-154,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:24-cv-00213-KDB-DCK)
Submitted: August 19, 2025 Decided: August 20, 2025
Before RICHARDSON, RUSHING, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anwar A. Aalaam, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas G. Hooper, BAKER DONELSON
BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C., Charlotte, North Carolina; Wade
Leach, III, Charlotte, North Carolina, Joshua Howard Threadcraft, BURR & FORMAN,
LLP, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anwar A. Aalaam appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint
related to mortgage foreclosure for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant Aalaam’s motion for leave to file supplemental evidence, deny Aalaam’s motion
for judicial notice, deny as moot Aalaam’s emergency motion for stay pending appeal, and
affirm the district court’s orders. Aalaam v. Movement Mortg., LLC, No. 5:24-cv-00213-
KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2025 & March 06, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.