The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1268•Brittany Marie Tomlinson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.; Ct Corporation System; Travis Schackmann
25-1268Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1268
BRITTANY MARIE TOMLINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.; CT CORPORATION SYSTEM; TRAVIS
SCHACKMANN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:25-cv-00053-FL)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 28, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brittany M. Tomlinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brittany Marie Tomlinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Tomlinson’s
civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Tomlinson v.
Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., No. 5:25-cv-00053-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2025). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.