Kristin E. Schelin; Mark A. Watson v. Karl Linard Malloy

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1275
KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK A. WATSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
KARL LINARD MALLOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Chief District Judge. (3:25-cv-00104-MHL)
Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Karl Linard Malloy appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of
jurisdiction his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order modifying subpoenas duces tecum
and issuing a protective order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Malloy’s appeal as
interlocutory. Schelin v. Malloy, No. 3:25-cv-00104-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2025); see
In re Bestwall, LLC, 99 F.4th 679, 686 (4th Cir. 2024) (“As a general rule, discovery orders
aren’t final and appealable; they are part of resolving a larger dispute.”). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --