The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1302•Najia Rahmani v. Paul Burnett
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1302
NAJIA RAHMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL BURNETT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01921-PTG-WEF)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Najia Rahmani, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Najia Rahmani appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her
civil complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).* We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Rahmani’s motion to amend
and terminate Defendant’s guardianship, deny Rahmani’s motion to jail and debar, and
affirm the district court’s order. Rahmani v. Burnett, No. 1:24-cv-01921-PTG-WEF (E.D.
Va. Mar. 18, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the court
dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th
790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.