The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1351•Tonya Dakari, a/k/a Tonya R. Dakari v. Broadview Federal Credit Union, f/k/a SEFCU
25-1351Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1351
TONYA DAKARI, a/k/a Tonya R. Dakari,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BROADVIEW FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, f/k/a SEFCU,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (3:23-cv-05884-JDA)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tonya R. Dakari, Appellant Pro Se. Yasmeen Ebbini, B. Rush Smith, III, NELSON
MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tonya R. Dakari appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and Dakari’s amended complaint alleging claims for breach of
contract and violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Dakari v.
Broadview Fed. Credit Union, No. 3:23-cv-05884-JDA (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.