The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1414•In re: Katherine Moore; Amy Palacios; Edyta Basista
25-1414Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1414
In re: KATHERINE MOORE; AMY PALACIOS; EDYTA BASISTA,
Petitioners.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:24-cv-00686-BO-KS)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katherine Moore, Amy Palacios, Edyta Basista, Petitioners Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Katherine Moore, Amy Palacios, and Edyta Basista petition for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on their motions for a preliminary
injunction. They seek an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied their motions and
dismissed their case on April 25, 2025. Accordingly, because the district court has recently
decided the Petitioners’ case, we deny the pending motion to sever as moot, and we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.