The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1418•Chesterfield General District Court v. Yenoshi Mondrey
25-1418Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1418
CHESTERFIELD GENERAL DISTRICT COURT,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
YENOSHI MONDREY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:25-cv-00176-JAG)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 3, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yenoshi Mondrey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Yenoshi Mondrey appeals the district court’s order remanding to state court
Mondrey’s nine state court criminal proceedings, which she attempted to remove to federal
court, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because removal was improper under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1443. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Mondrey’s motion to compel judicial ruling and notice of prejudice by delay, deny
Mondrey’s motion to dismiss the underlying cases for lack of territorial subject matter
jurisdiction, and affirm the district court’s remand order. Chesterfield Gen. Dist. Ct. v.
Mondrey, No. 3:25-cv-00176-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.