Evelyn R. Sinkler v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1442
EVELYN R. SINKLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02364-MSN-LRV)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. Terrance Wayne Anderson, Jr., NELSON MULLINS
RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Boca Raton, Florida, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting Defendant’s motion
to dismiss Sinkler’s civil action; and (2) denying her “Motion to Vacate Void Orders and
Enter Default Judgment” and “Consolidated Motion for Relief From Judgment Under Rule
60(b).” On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”).
We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the issues Sinkler raises in her pro
se filings with this Court and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Sinkler v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-02364-
MSN-LRV (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2025; Apr. 21, 2025). We grant Sinkler’s motion to submit
the appeal based on her informal opening and supplemental opening briefs. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --