The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1467•Christos D. Dedes v. Rosewell Paige
25-1467Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1467
CHRISTOS D. DEDES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROSEWELL PAIGE; JOHN H. O’BRION, JR.; JAMES WATSON MORRIS, III;
DANIEL T. BALFOUR; SHILLING & ASSOCIATES; WILLIAM R. CURDTS;
JAMES R. SPENCER, Judge of the United States District Court; JAMES WARD;
ROBERT BROOKS, Lawyer; PAUL BUCKWALTER; THE
COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY CHESTERFIELD COUNTY; MARY
MARTELINO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00110-RCY)
Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christos D. Dedes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christos D. Dedes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
without prejudice for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Dedes v. Paige, No. 3:24-cv-00110-RCY (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.