Katherine Moore; Amy Palacios; Edyta Basista v. Mike Silver, in his individual

25-1500Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 22, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1500
KATHERINE MOORE; AMY PALACIOS; EDYTA BASISTA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MIKE SILVER, in his individual and official capacities as Training and Services
Director for North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:24-cv-00686-BO-KS)
Submitted: September 18, 2025 Decided: September 22, 2025
Before THACKER and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katherine Moore, Amy Palacios, Edyta Basista, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Katherine Moore, Amy Palacios, and Edyta Basista (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district
court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss their amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint and denying their motions for a preliminary injunction. First, we grant
Plaintiffs’ motion to exceed the length limitations for the informal brief. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that Plaintiffs
lacked standing to pursue their claims against Defendant and failed to state a claim for
relief. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a severance and to expedite and affirm the
district court’s judgment. Moore v. Silver, No. 5:24-cv-00686-BO-KS (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25,
2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.