PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit v. United States Patent & Trademark Office, (uspto)

25-1522Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1522
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897,
d/b/a United Emrits of America,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, (USPTO); UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT
CENTER, (GSFC); AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, (AIP); KENNEDY
SPACE CENTER; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, (NSF),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:25-cv-01187-PX)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number
P60005535) seeks to appeal the deficiency notice entered by the district court’s clerk’s
office directing him to correct issues in the initial filing of his civil complaint. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny
Emrit’s motion to transfer and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.