The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1537•S. BOYD, Successor v. Municipality Robersonville
25-1537Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1537
S. BOYD, Successor,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MUNICIPALITY ROBERSONVILLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:24-cv-00059-FL)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
S. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Frederick Hughes Bailey, III, SUMRELL SUGG, PA, New
Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
S. Boyd appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint and denying reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Boyd v. Mun. Robersonville, No. 4:24-cv-00059-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2024; Apr. 16,
2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.