The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1547•Stan Laber v. PETE HEGSETH, Secretary of the DOD
25-1547Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1547
STAN LABER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETE HEGSETH, Secretary of the DOD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:23-cv-00498-JAG)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 20, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stan Laber, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stan Laber appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for
Reconsideration of Opinion ECF 56 PER RULE 59(e).” We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laber v.
Hegseth, No. 3:23-cv-00498-JAG (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.