The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1571•Brian David Hill v. Haylea Workman; Drew Inman
25-1571Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1571
BRIAN DAVID HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAYLEA WORKMAN; DREW INMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:25-cv-00004-JAG)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief for failure to state a
claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and discern no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. Workman, No.
4:25-cv-00004-JAG (W.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.