The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1589•John Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. Megan Ashley Rushton; Turner-Padget Law Firm
25-1589Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1589
JOHN CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEGAN ASHLEY RUSHTON; TURNER-PADGET LAW FIRM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:24-cv-07370-BHH)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 3, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Clarence Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pedrick McWilliams, MAYNARD
NEXSEN PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
John Clarence Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting Defendant Turner-Padget Law Firm’s
(“TPL”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, and dismissing Johnson’s civil
complaint for failure to state a claim.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v. Rushton, No.
6:24-cv-07370-BHH (D.S.C. May 15, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court in its order refers to TPL’s motion as one for summary
judgment, TPL moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and there is no indication that
the district court considered the motion otherwise.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.