Latia Thompson-McKoy v. Udr, Incorporated

25-1599Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1599
LATIA THOMPSON-MCKOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UDR, INCORPORATED; JOSEPH D. FISHER, Chief Financial Officer/President;
BRENNA COSTNER, UDR, Inc. Business Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00611-JRR)
Submitted: August 14, 2025 Decided: October 6, 2025
Before GREGORY and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Latia Thompson-Mckoy, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Andrew Johnston, Darcy Osta,
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees
Fisher and Costner.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Latia Thompson-Mckoy seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her initial
and first renewed requests for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Thompson-Mckoy seeks to appeal are
neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.* See Off. of Pers.
Mgmt. v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Emps., 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-05 (1985) (discussing
appealability of order denying temporary restraining order). Accordingly, we deny
Thompson-Mckoy’s pending motions, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
* Because Thompson-Mckoy’s claims against the defendants are still pending in the
district court, a final order has not yet been entered. See Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696
(4th Cir. 2015) (discussing finality).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.