The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1697•Jerome Andrew Burnett v. EDWARD A. GARMATZ, United States District Courthouse
25-1697Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1697
JEROME ANDREW BURNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD A. GARMATZ, United States District Courthouse,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00501-ABA)
Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 20, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Andrew Burnett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Andrew Burnett appeals the district court’s orders (1) sua sponte dismissing
his complaint alleging violation of his constitutional rights and various federal statutes, and
denying as moot his motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) denying reconsideration
of the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Burnett v. Garmatz, No. 1:25-cv-00501-
ABA (D. Md. May 16, 2025; June 9, 2025). We deny Burnett’s pending motions. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.