The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1713•Alexander John Garcia v. United States of America; Army Department of Defense
25-1713Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1713
ALEXANDER JOHN GARCIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ARMY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00681-KDB-SCR)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 22, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander John Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander John Garcia appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’
motion to dismiss Garcia’s complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
See, e.g., Yolken v. United States, 590 F.2d 1303 (4th Cir. 1979) (noting that the Feres*
doctrine bars “negligent induction” claims stemming from the suicide of a mental ill service
member). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950) (holding government immune to
FTCA claims arising from activities “incident to service” of military personnel).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.