The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1716•KEVIN ERIC SCOTT, Private Living Trust, Private American state national, Cestui que… v. United States Department of Justice
25-1716Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1716
KEVIN ERIC SCOTT, Private Living Trust, Private American state national, Cestui
que trust, Subrogee,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; KRISTI NOEM, Department of
Homeland Security; AMY T. LEE, Immigration Judge, Executive Office for
Immigration Review; STACEY MARCOTT, CFO, Office of the General Counsel;
KEVIN ERIC SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:25-cv-00027-GCM)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025
Amended: December 1, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Eric Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Janice Powers, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Eric Scott appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees’
motion to dismiss his amended complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have
reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Scott v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., No. 3:25-cv-00027-GCM (W.D.N.C. June 12,
2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.