Jamaal Gittens v. Tripp Helms; Steven Higdon; Chelsey Wilson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1810
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TRIPP HELMS; STEVEN HIGDON; CHELSEY WILSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and conclude
that the district court properly dismissed the complaint upon finding that the defendants
were entitled to judicial immunity and prosecutorial immunity. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gittens v. Helms,
No. 3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. July 1, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --