Paytawn Andrew Erskine v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC; John B. Goodman

25-1847Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 3, 2026

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1847
PAYTAWN ANDREW ERSKINE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC; JOHN B. GOODMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:25-cv-00089-JKB)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 2, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paytawn Andrew Erskine, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel J. Fazio, DAN FAZIO LAW LLC,
Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paytawn Andrew Erskine appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment and motion to file a second amended complaint
and granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion, dismissing his amended civil
action, and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.* We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Erskine v.
Accenture Fed. Servs., LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00089-JKB (D. Md. May 22 & June 25, 2025).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Erskine filed motions to extend the time for filing his reply brief and for leave to
file his reply brief before this court. We grant those motions.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.